On 5/25/07, Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2007, William Moore wrote:
> I think what mark was referring to there is dynamic spans. They
> actually work over a standard ethernet network. They are configured in
> zaptel.conf and zapata.conf just like any other zaptel device.
Interesting! So Zaptel does have native TDMoE capabilities.
Technically.
Can anyone comment on successes or failures they've had in using these?
Most of the feedback I've heard even on high-end TDMoE gear has been very
lukewarm.
It is not something you should consider currently. Unless the Asterisk
development team suddenly decides to update the code.
Also, what about density? Has anyone tried putting substantially more
than one quad-span T1 card in an Asterisk box, repeated a couple of times
and clustered together with some level of TDMoE?
Well with a single 24 channel spam running PRI the load on th e
machine shoots up to a crazy amount.... with Linux 2.6
I don't like to over-post but I just had to bring this one from the
archives to your attention:
On 4/11/07, Andrew Joakimsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would suggest you avoid TDMoE its support is pretty much depreciated
and not supported by Digium. Does not work well with Kernel 2.6.x.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
