On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 03:35:36AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> Well if you are out of luck with asterisk .. How about its fork
> callweaver
Is it not enough that they have forked Asterisk, you now want to fork
from CallWeaver? You're sure after some interesting life ;-)
> ? I am highly awaiting its stable release to see if it
> holds upto what its wiki says .
The Wiki also says quite a few good things about Asterisk. Some people
here don't fully trust that. Please remind me how many public releases
have there been of CallWeaver?
You can say quite a few things about it and its codebase, but you
seem to have picked the wrong argument. CallWeaver has yet to
prove itself and earn its reputation.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
