Matthew J. Roth wrote: > In the meantime, I'm looking for insights as to what would cause > Asterisk (or any other process) to idle at the same value, despite > having similar workloads and twice as many CPUs available to it. I'll > be working on benchmarking Asterisk from very low to very high call > volumes so any suggestions or tips, such as how to generate a large > number of calls or what statistics I should gather, would also be > appreciated.
I am very curious if using this library on your system will help increase the load you are able to put on the dual core system. http://www.hoard.org/ People that are running Asterisk on Solaris have noted that using the mtmalloc library allows for much higher call density. I am hoping that hoard will let the people running Asterisk on Linux see similar performance improvements, but I have yet to convince anyone to give it a try and let me know how it goes. :) -- Russell Bryant Software Engineer Digium, Inc. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
