Jack wrote: > Thanks for your answer and sorry for my late response. > > So what does this exactly mean to me? Can I keep chan_features.so from > 1.4.4? What consequences does it have when chan_features.so is disabled > und why has this been done? Is chan_features.so related to features.conf? >
chan_features.so doesn't provide anything useful, it's not used anywhere because it's not really finished. As for why it was changed to be disabled by default oej probably thought that since we aren't using it why do we have it enabled by default. It's fine to live in a world without chan_features.so :) -- Joshua Colp Software Developer Digium, Inc. - "The Genuine Asterisk Experience" (TM) _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
