> just an idea, but maybe qmail, samba, and bind have a smaller memory > footprint than an in-use asterisk?
No, probably not. Asterisk's is about 20-40 MB depending on the number of extensions, etc. Smbd's is similar, bind's is actually 90 MB (with about 600 zones). > can you take the hardware offline long enough for a memtest? The machine has been retired (routine upgrade cycle). But I hardly doubt that was the problem. My guess is it was somehow related to limited CPU power (thread switching, interrupts, or whatnot). The old hardware was single CPU and a lot slower. --Luki _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
