On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Steve Underwood wrote: > So, with some effort, and possibly with some patent licencing it could > kinda work. On the other hand, the industry standard approach is to > avoid this completely, and use RFC4733 (used to be RFC2833), which > avoids any degradation in performance, and is simple to implement.
I would also be curious to know when and where there is ever a compelling reason to use inband DTMF representation with any codec, in any set of circumstances, barring one in which some intermediate element does not support out-of-band RFC 4733 events. -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : +1-678-954-0670 Direct : +1-678-954-0671 _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
