On 7/4/07, Jon Pounder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think if Sangoma heard from enough interested North American users, > they would write the driver. doesn't it seem strange they went to the trouble to get the fcc certification (as per their site) if it doesn't understand the north american signalling ?
I wonder if this is issue is largely limited to to Canada. (thus limiting the market) In the states I think you can get PRI for around $250. Am I right? In Canada, you have to have about 9 or 10 lines to justify a PRI. At $250, the cost and added features could justify PRI at around 4 lines. Mind you, that still leaves a whole tonne of systems at the 4 lines and under mark. The next time a Sangoma staffer comes out to a Toronto Asterisk User Group meeting, I'll get 'em all tipsy and make them sign something about committing to supporting the North American BRI. :-) PS - to whoever it was that said they got the telus quote ... what
province was that in ? In Ontario Telus is just not interested in selling BRI (could just be the sales rep too, he is kind of lazy. here though its a resale of a bell canada service though, and btw whew that telus/bell merger plan last week died quickly thank goodness, combining bad and worse never makes anything good)
I think that's a regulatory thing. In Ontario, Telus is considered a competitor not the incumbent. I think that only the incumbent in any area is bound by the tariffs. Out west it would be the opposite, Telus would be the incumbent there. For anyone who' interested, I decided to read up a bit and found an interesting primer. http://www.ralphb.net/ISDN/ Tzafrir: It discusses North America specifically and identifies the specific ITU Q-Series documents that define the various protocol layers. Dave
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
