Steve Totaro wrote: > Anthony Francis wrote: > >> Tim Panton wrote: >> >> >>> On 5 Aug 2007, at 06:54, Douglas Garstang wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> I don't think creating a network without a single point of failure >>>> is unreasonable. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> It's impossible. I can't think of a single example where this >>> actually exists. >>> >>> Getting even close is hideously expensive. >>> >>> Tim, speaking for himself :-) >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- >>> >>> asterisk-users mailing list >>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >>> >>> >>> >> In fact, the only people who would say something like this are folks who >> have never PHYSICALLY implemented a network, they simply don't >> understand the limitations involved. >> >> Anthony >> >> >> > > What if a train derails and slices through the main fiber connections. > OK, so you have XO, Global Crossing, Verizon, and UCN all for > redundancy. Well guess what? They are all most likely running over > those strands of fiber. You better have a VSAT connection too! > > Thanks, > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > And then your customers complain not about lack of availability, but about the hideous delay caused by the sat latency. ;)
All SIP deployments should come with emergency communications kits consisting of two cans and a spool of string. N. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
