Doug Lytle wrote: >Kate Kretz wrote: > > >>OpenVPN is very good in NAT (if one of your boxes is behind NAT). >>otherwise, OpenVPN seems to be a bad choice, it's complicated, >>non-standard (there'n no RFC on OpenVPN). >> >> > >It's complicated? No more so then Asterisk. > >We use, it was quite straight forward to set up and the audio quality >over it is quite good. > >Doug > > >
Just another OpenVPN data point, and not Asterisk related but here goes. I run 15 users over a DSL link on one end and a Internet T1 on the other with OpenVPN and it just rocks. The road warrior setup is down to running one script to create a file, email file to user and the user run one script. It has been rock solid for me. Alan _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
