On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 07:16:57PM -0400, Lee Jenkins wrote:
> Steve Totaro wrote:
> > David Gomillion wrote:
> >> On 8/23/07, *Ed Pastore* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi, folks.
> >>
> >> I've been on the Asterisk Announce list for a while now, and it seems
> >> to me that the release versions of Asterisk are a bit bleeding-edge.
> >> They qualify as stable, but I wouldn't call them "production stable"
> >> since half the time a new one comes out, a fix for it comes out the
> >> next day.
> >>
> >>
> >> That's the niche that ABE is supposed to fill. I personally don't use
> >> it, though. I just test the features I plan to use, disable everything
> >> else, and seem to do OK.
What version of Asterisk is "current ABE" (something that would get
installed on a new system with no relation to other systems) based on?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I stay with 1.2.12 or somewhere around there. "End Of Life" but seems
> > to have a better ticker than 1.4.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Steve
> >
>
> 1.2.12/14/17 all have seemed very stable to me so far.
Both of which are anecdotial evidences.
Now suppose I had a major stability issue with 1.2.14 which was solved
with 1.2.18 (or 1.4.1). I would simply be dropped off that tatistics.
You'l be just left with those for which "1.2 works better".
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
