Trevor Peirce wrote: > Matthew Fredrickson wrote: > >> Trevor Peirce wrote: >> >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Has anyone tried the combination of asterisk 1.2.24, zaptel 1.4.5 and >>> HPEC 9.00.003? >>> >>> >> First of all... Why are you using zaptel 1.4.5 with asterisk 1.2? That >> is a red flag in itself. >> >> >> > > References: > > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2007-January/177404.html > > There was another thread once upon a time where it was also indicated > that there would not be any problems. Possibly the one Steve Totaro > mentioned in another reply. > > The motivation behind this was to resolve echo issues using the newer > echo can. When I finally was able to get some HPEC licenses it was > easier to just keep using what had proved stable (which was zaptel 1.4 > with asterisk 1.2). Unfortunately the system started crashing often. I > tested this on different hardware at the same facility and it crashed > less often, but it still crashed. > > Now if it's a miracle that asterisk 1.2 and zaptel 1.4 could ever play > nice together, that could explain it. But if there is nothing wrong with > it, then I'd say this is a bug, hence why I asked if anyone else was > using it in a similar manner. > > Thanks, > Trevor > > Just to make sure you saw this reply quoted from Tzafrir, seems to really know his stuff: / If you want to be able to build asterisk 1.2 with zaptel 1.4 you'll need: ln -s ../zaptel/zaptel.h /usr/include/linux/zaptel.h ln -s zaptel/tonezone.h /usr/include/tonezone.h Note: I'm not sure exactly what happens if you run a 'make install' of zaptel 1.2 on top of that later. I guess you should remove those two symlinks manually before you do that. / Thanks, Steve Totaro/ /
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
