Le Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:20:01 +0400, Andrew Joakimsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
> On 8/25/07, Jean-Michel Hiver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm already receiving the calls as g.729, so there is little gain >> (slightly less bandwith usage, slighly worse sound) in doing g.729 -> >> g.723 transcoding - while doing IAX2 trunking vs NOT doing it seems to >> half the bandwith requirement. > > > Main point was CPU usage. Even if you "receive" the calls as G729 then > you need to transcode to Alaw and transcode all the alaw from the E1 > to G729. > > Unless somehow you have an E1 using G729! I do. I use a variety of audiocodes, patton, and quescom SIP gateways. All support g.729. Cheers, Jean-Michel. -- Jean-Michel Hiver - YKOZ +262 (0)692 828 070 _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
