Actually, when someone asked a legitimate question about how to account for a + sign, you jumped into the thread saying that such things were useless and that people should just learn how to dial 011 since that's all a plus sign means. When it was pointed out that it IS, in fact, a legitimate concern, and that there are many situations in which accounting for a + being dialed are advantageous, you come back with a statement about how that's outside the US, so you're not concerned with that.
For someone who reads offense into pretty unoffensive posts, your attitude is pretty offensive. If you had nothing worthwhile to add to the thread other than statements about how people outside the US do things you don't understand and don't care about, then perhaps it would have been a good idea just to stay quiet. N. Anthony Francis wrote: > Not being concerned does not == ignorant.4 > > Benny Amorsen wrote: > >>>>>>> "AF" == Anthony Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> AF> I knew that was true about GSM networks outside of the US, but to >> AF> be honest, I am not concerned with those networks ^^. >> >> >> >>>> On 8/31/07, Anthony Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >> >> >>>>> Mindfully wanting to use a + instead of knowing the international >>>>> access code seems like willful ignorance to me. >>>>> >>>>> >> Now who is being willfully ignorant? >> >> >> /Benny >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- >> >> asterisk-users mailing list >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
