Am Sonntag, den 02.09.2007, 23:25 -0700 schrieb fateme fatah: > Hi: > When should we use "unnumbered priorities"(n) in extensions.What is > the different between these 2 forms of extensions.conf? and ,Are both > true? > extensions.conf: > form1: > [Conferencerooms] > exten => 333,1,Answer > exten => 333,n,meetme(8000|cim) > exten => 333,n,playback(vm-goodbye) > exten => 333,n,hangup > > form2: > [Conferencerooms] > exten => 333,1,Answer > exten => 333,2,meetme(8000|cim) > exten => 333,3,playback(vm-goodbye) > exten => 333,4,hangup
On one of my Asterisk 1.2 setups, I have a dialplan that mixes both - so they can coexist in the same extensions.conf. The difference is that with the "n" type extensions, you can easily insert a line or three without renumbering lots of lines - and searching for all those GOTOs that also need a new line number. Renumbering error-prone. An advantage of numbering is that the line order is not important, because of course Asterisk would select by number, not order - and possibly (although I did not investigate this) including _parts_ of an extension from another context might work better. All my new extensions use the "n" style, but I am not going to rewrite the older parts of the dialplan soon. BR Anselm _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
