Perhaps I'll be a little more amicable when someone finds a way to bring at least five or six DS3s into Asterisk.
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Alex Balashov wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Anthony Francis wrote: > >> IMHO asterisk is a softswitch, it may not be a very high capacity one >> (right now) but it can be and if you don't mind splitting your physical >> trunk calls over multiple machines it works very well as a call routing >> engine, you just need to have carefully designed plans. It is far to easy >> to create call routing loops, but if you don't know what you are doing with >> a real telephony switch you can do the same. > > No SS7/ISUP support (and no TCAP, which is required for LNP and LIDB and > traditional CNAM), poor/incomplete IMT support, can't take more than a few > T1s per host - if that. No GR.303 support. > > To me that makes it essentially impotent for 99% of the purposes for which > one would want a Real Softswitch(TM). > > -- > Alex Balashov > Evariste Systems > Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ > Tel : +1-678-954-0670 > Direct : +1-678-954-0671 > -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : +1-678-954-0670 Direct : +1-678-954-0671 _______________________________________________ Sign up now for AstriCon 2007! September 25-28th. http://www.astricon.net/ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
