It's not the Ethernet interface that would be the issue. The zaptel framework wouldn't be able to handle it with the way it uses interrupts.
On 10/9/07, Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:14 -0400, Matt wrote: > > Before you put any work into this... ask yourself... what exactly are > > you hoping to accomplish? > > I can imagine it be used as a TDM-SIP gateway but if I needed such a box > I'd rather go for a Lucent MaxTNT, Lucent APX8000 or a Cisco 5xxx or > look at FreeSWITCH which by design seems more suitable for these kind of > high performance applications. > > > There is no way one system can handle a DS3s worth of traffic... > > therefore, what good would this do? > > Why wouldn't today's powerful quadcore servers with Gigabit Ethernet > interfaces not be able to handle less than 100Mbit/s synchronous > traffic? Please enlighten me as I am no expert here. > > Regards, > Patrick > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
