Thanks Matthew and every one who had replied to my post! I will install my Sangoma A400D card on my existing server and I will give it a try, since we have the old PBX still working (its planned to be on operation until the end of this year) it will serve as a lab, and if there is much trouble we still have some time to order a new server and migrate the configs made. In that case, I will buy a server with a FSB1333 CPU. I don't know if we can afford a 3GHz CPU, but I'll keep it in mind.
I think for Asterisk a SATA RAID(1 or 5) will be enough, but I will buy SAS disc if it fits in the budget ... Thanks everyone! Raúl On 10/15/07, Matthew J. Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Raúl, > > The short answer is yes, it's better to install Asterisk on a dedicated > system. The long answer is that you could probably get away with it, > but if you have problems you'll be dealing with a lot of variables > during troubleshooting. When that time comes, I wouldn't be surprised > if the first piece of advice people give you is to offload the non-VoIP > related tasks from the server. > > For 35 simultaneous calls, I'd recommend a dedicated server with a 3.0 > GHz dual-core CPU, 2 GB of RAM, and fast SCSI disks. In my experience, > the FSB can be just as important as processor speed so keep that in mind > as you lay out your budget. You should be able to buy something from > Dell with redundant power supplies (and other convenient features like a > remote access controller) for an affordable price. > > Regards, > > Matthew Roth > InterMedia Marketing Solutions > Software Engineer and Systems Developer > >
_______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
