----- Original Message ----- From: "Mojo with Horan & Company, LLC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 1:20 AM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PSTN failover
> Dovid B wrote: >> Chanisavail does not work well for this. I would use priority jumping >> (n+101). >> > Using ChanIsAvail with the 's' option is supposed to assume a SIP > channel is occupied if it's in use ANYWHERE under asterisk's wing. For > clarification, Dovid, have your poor experiences occurred with the 's' > or without? I tell myself I've been meaning to switch away from > priority jumping into using chanisavail, but always just assumed that > the 's' options was all I would need to use when it came time.... > It was not with s. I was with Exten => _X.,ChanisAvail(.............................. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
