Chris Bagnall wrote: >> Our testing has yielded pretty good results. We had 10 simultaneous >> calls with ulaw and quality was very good. We are pure VOIP also. >> > How many VMs were you running at the time, and what load were they under? > > We've setups running between 3 and 5 VMs on a single box (multi-core, lots of > RAM, etc.) and we haven't had any problems with them. Would be interesting to > know how well it'll scale with more VMs on each box >
Also, the number of successful Asterisk VMs will depend on the virtualisation technology used. The literature strongly suggests that Xen will work better than VMware, OpenVZ better than Xen, and Virtuozzo better than OpenVZ. YMMV. We offer (as a business) Virtual Private Asterisk Servers (see www.vpas.ca) and have no problem running many more than 3 to 5 virtual Asterisk instances on a single server in commercially demanding environments. -- George Pajari (dCAP), netVOICE communications 604 484 VOIP(8647) x102 www.netvoice.ca www.ip-centrex.ca www.ip-pbx.ca www.vpas.ca www.digium.ca www.grandstream.ca www.sipura.ca www.snom.ca Open Source VoIP/Telephony Specialists 1 877 NET VOIP (638 8647 x102) _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users