On 8/29/07, Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Carlos Chavez wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 00:03 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:11:03PM +0200, Christian Peter wrote: > >> > >>> Hi list, > >>> > >>> I'm running current SpanDSP > >>> http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz > >>> with Asterisk 1.2.22 somewhat successfully. > >>> > >> Shouldn't you have used spandsp 0.0.3 with asterisk 1.2 ? > >> > >> > > Actually, as Steve Underwood has gently reminded the list several > > times, he recommends SpanDsp 0.0.2 for Asterisk 1.2 > > > Well, its not so much that I recommend it. Its just that I have never > done anything to adapt the app_rxfax.c and app_txfax.c for Asterisk to > work with newer versions of spandsp. Compared to the current spandsp, > the softFAX in 0.0.2 actually sucks. > > Steve >
I've been using SpanDSP 0.0.3 and the app_rxfax of January 2006 (I notice there is a newer one) and it works great. No problem receiving 100+ page faxes via PRI. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users