Andrea Spadaccini wrote: > IMHO it's better to build a FSM (Finite State Machine) that handles > the Asterisk process and other collateral processes (like the MAPI > proxy) and let it monitor the process. > > Moreover, you should make this FSM sensible to UNIX signals in order > to start, stop, restart Asterisk easily if you want.
Hi Andrea that's exactly the kind of elaborate scheme I was hoping to avoid. What do you do today? /Per Jessen, Zürich -- http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
