On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:05:47 -0600, "Eric \"ManxPower\" Wieling"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Why not use ${UNIQUEID}?
It's not listed in ATFT, even 2nd ed, so I didn't know about it.
Seems like ${UNIQUEID} is generated with each new call, and includes
an extension:
-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Verbose("SIP/9001-081d6630",
"1194783496.46") in new stack
1194783496.46
-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2] Verbose("SIP/9001-081d6630",
"1194783496.46") in new stack
1194783496.46
== Auto fallthrough, channel 'SIP/9001-081d6630' status is 'UNKNOWN'
-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Verbose("SIP/9001-081f5940",
"1194783510.47") in new stack
1194783510.47
-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2] Verbose("SIP/9001-081f5940",
"1194783510.47") in new stack
1194783510.47
== Auto fallthrough, channel 'SIP/9001-081f5940' status is 'UNKNOWN'
Looks like an equally good way to generate a unique filename. Thanks!
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
