2008/1/10, Benny Amorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > "Steve Langstaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I agree that sending an OPTION message from the Asterisk server could > > well have a low processing load. > > > > The original poster wanted to use OPTIONS sent FROM the Asterisk server > > to query the phone state, so I don't think your concerns about receive > > processing come into the picture. > > If the asterisk community is going to ask the phone manufacturers to > comply to the RFC, it looks rather silly
Shall we really care about this ? As Steve said, ourselves not implementing RFC compliant OPTIONS is another topic. when asterisk itself doesn't. > > Not that I have a good solution. Separating problems might help to find such good solution /Benny > > > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
