Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:08:33AM +0000, Thomas Kenyon wrote: > >> If there was an equivalent free codec that provided good quality audio >> with such high compression and was widely supported, then I'd use it. > > Help make speex widely supported. Or continue to suffer with g729 and > g723. > The problem with speex though is that for the same bit rate, the quality isn't as good as G.729, The transcode takes twice as much runtime (according to show translation recalc 10).
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
