On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 05:44:12PM +0200, Atis Lezdins wrote: > On 1/17/08, Atis Lezdins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/17/08, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 03:09:59PM +0200, Atis Lezdins wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I'm wondering why zttest shows > > > > Best: 99.976 -- Worst: 99.967 -- Average: 99.971469, Difference: > > > > 99.971469 > > > > > > > > Shouldn't it be 100% as timing is hardware and comes from PRI? Am I > > > > missing some kernel config? > > > > > > It may be slightly different. Your system clock may be slightly off. But > > > more importantly, zttest doesn't start and stop messuring time at > > > exactly the right spot. > > > > Anything i can improve? > > > > I think - zttest should do it correctly, as manpage says - definite > > pass is 100% or 99.99% > > > > I'm just having some issues with faxing, so i thought this could be a > > problem. > > Ping. > > Any ideas what i could do to improve timing accuracy? Some kernel > options? Newer kernel? Currently I have kernel from RPM:
The question is: "How to improve the meassurment of timing". Also, some report that Steve Underwood's sliptest is a useful tool for that. If you find it useful, I have a small patch that makes it slightly more usable. http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/sliptest.c -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
