I'd be even more likely to use nightly (or other periodic snapshot, even weekly) .deb packages. Because then I could use APT to notify me and manage them. Especially if they included a changelog (which APT reports), even if that changelog were only names of files/modules touched since the last one.
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 12:00 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:21:54 -0600 > From: Russell Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [asterisk-users] Nightly tarballs, would you use them? > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Greetings, > > During the past week, there have been some requests for nightly > tarballs to help > making testing new Asterisk code easier. There was some debate as to > whether > they would be useful. The reason that they may not be useful is > because you can > get equivalent access to new code just by accessing the subversion > repository > directly. However, for one reason or another, some people would > prefer to have > a tarball. > > If this was available, would you be interested in it? > > If you just want to say "yes or no" for the sake of the poll, fell > free to > respond to me off-list. However, also fell free to respond here if > you have > more verbose comments on the topic that you would like to share. > > -- > Russell Bryant -- (C) Matthew Rubenstein _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
