Link? Thanks, Steve Totaro
On Jan 23, 2008 6:08 PM, Paul Hales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There was a cool paper written a a few months ago where they tested some > older dell servers - full details of specs and tests were available. > > PaulH > > > > > On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 08:54 +1100, Daniel Cole wrote: > > Sorry to be a little OT.. But may I ask what some more of the specs > > are for that machine? Just trying to get an idea of what different > > hardware can achieve. > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen > > Davies > > Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2008 7:57 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List - > > Non-Commercial Discussion > > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk scalability > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure that an Asterisk developer can chime in and give > > several examples > > of how Asterisk uses its threads to increase scalability. That > > said, there > > will be a point where the number of core/CPU's won't be the > > bottleneck so > > adding more won't help anything. > > > > > > > > Asterisk is highly multi-threaded and definitely takes advantage of > > multiple cores. > > > > > > There are a few places where concurrency could be further improved, > > but its really quite good in 1.4. (IAX in 1.4 does handle traffic > > using a thread pool so will take advantage of multiple cores). > > > > > > By the way, I have a client with a four-core Xeon box doing SIP to IAX > > conversion - that box can handle 1000 concurrent calls. > > > > > > Steve > > > > > _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
