On Wednesday 13 February 2008 11:45:34 Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > Having programmed in about 8 different languages over the last 25 > years, I can see both points of view. And admittedly, I haven't tried > to do non-trivial things with dialplan. > > That said, my view of this interaction is that Tilghman has drunk the > Kool-Aid<tm>, and that Alex's view of the situation is much closer to > objective.
Or maybe I'm just the architect of the dialplan moving forward, which is why I advocate that if you really don't need to use AGI, you don't. ;-) > dialplan appears to have "jes' growed", and that never makes for a good > language design. Ask the Python 3 team. :-) I'm specifically working on removing misfeatures from the dialplan, to make it much easier to use and more predictable. 1.6 will be a huge improvement towards this goal. -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
