On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 22:32, TkVoice Author wrote: > Thanks TC > > I will check this out. > > I did notice 1 error if anyone is concerned: > > I patched against asterisk-v0.5.0 and I got this result:
You probably need to be at a more current version than 0.5.0, and you should be concerned that the offsets are so far off since this means there was major changes since the diff was made. > patch -p0 < distinctiveringpatch.diff > > patching file asterisk/channels/chan_zap.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 134 (offset -1 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 317 (offset -6 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 381 (offset -1 lines). > Hunk #4 succeeded at 504 (offset -14 lines). > Hunk #5 succeeded at 3869 (offset -96 lines). > Hunk #6 succeeded at 4387 (offset -18 lines). > Hunk #7 FAILED at 4416. > Hunk #8 succeeded at 4368 (offset -98 lines). > Hunk #9 succeeded at 5256 (offset -55 lines). > Hunk #10 succeeded at 5240 (offset -100 lines). > Hunk #11 succeeded at 6786 (offset -210 lines). > Hunk #12 succeeded at 6976 (offset -100 lines). > Hunk #13 succeeded at 7254 (offset -221 lines). > Hunk #14 succeeded at 7405 (offset -100 lines). > Hunk #15 succeeded at 7377 (offset -221 lines). > 1 out of 15 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > asterisk/channels/chan_zap.c.rej > > TC wrote: > > >You can try this hacking this patch > >http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000504 > > > > -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
