Quoting SIP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Adam Moffett wrote: >> In all seriousness, my requirements were a little silly. A Cisco router >> can fail just as a netgear router can. But I think we would find Cisco >> failures to be statistically less likely. >> >> I also think we can agree that not all devices of a certain type are >> created equal. Do you have any opinions on which VoIP products are more >> likely to be consistent and reliable? >> >> > Realistically, I've had issues with every ATA I've used to SOME degree. > The Leadtek BVA series has numerous issues. I've had bizarre things > occur in all of my Linksys/Sipura adapters(2000,3000,3201) (issues with > timeouts on a lost connection, NAT traversal, etc). My Grandstream > HT486 and 488s have intermittent dialing failures. I've had a lot of > issues with the Audiocodes MPs. > > The only ATA I've NOT actually had any issues with has been my > Grandstream HT386. Granted, I have issues with its capabilities overall, > but on the whole, it's the only one that's not simply had some weird > random failure as the others have. > > Does this mean I'd recommend an HT386 as solid testing piece? Heavens > no. I'd probably recommend the Linksys SPA3102. But be aware that there > ARE issues with just about all of them, and I doubt there have even been > enough variants sold/used by everyone to merit statistical analyses. > What you're going to get for recommendations will be, at best, anecdotal. > > N. >
I have two SPA3102s, and two PAP2-NAs. All of them have worked flawlessly. I have my SPA3102s on a real IP, and have tested the PAP2's from real IPs and behind nat. They do seem to "just work" after being configured. My only complaint is with Linksys/Cisco's support, or lack of it. Tim _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
