What is the logic of them using SIP over TCP? Is this a broad industry trend? Or just the latest attempt to get around SIP/NAT issues?
Michael Graves mgraves <at> mstvp.com o(713) 861-4005 c(713) 201-1262 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] skype mjgraves FWD 54245 > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Microsoft Office Communications Server > From: "Kristian Kielhofner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, March 10, 2008 5:18 pm > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > <[email protected]> > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Matt Riddell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Has anyone done any integration with this? > > > > All I know so far is that it appears to use some non standard form of SIP. > > > > Any pointers? > > > > - -- > > Kind Regards, > > > > Matt Riddell > > Director > Matt, > I believe OCS only supports SIP over TCP. You'll either need to use > Asterisk 1.6/trunk with SIP TCP or install SER/OpenSER as a UDP-TCP > proxy. > -- > Kristian Kielhofner > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
