On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 01:27:47AM -0400, Al Baker wrote: > From a lot of experience - you are not being anywhere near paranoid > enough !!!!!!!!!! > Think dual RAID controllers, Dual power supplies off of, at a Minimum, > separate isolated circuits, with Hefty UPS that is in-line so it filters > the power, think mirrored systems with a simple from switch from Black > Box that will throw the lines over to the working box. Think -hmmm, how > to keep v-mail between boxes in sync. Think remote console access to the > server below multi-user level > Think... is your azz is on the line for this install, I would give real > consideration about doing this until you hzve a better plan, more $$$ in > hand or a SLA to the end user that is very very forgiving. > My 2 cents, worth all that you pad for it :)
Hmmm..... Isn't it simpler and cheaper to just keep a backup system? Dual- everything means a more complex system and hence more chances of something to go wrong (be that due to misconfiguration). Before jumping up and throwing hardware at the problem, think what the problem actually is. For instance, why a RAID? What are the important data we wish to keep? Can you afford loosing a couple of hours of records in case of such a disaster (from your last copy). Oh, and something in the news from yesterday: http://lwn.net/Articles/274079/ -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
