On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Norman Franke wrote: > On Mar 20, 2008, at 12:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Sure some others on here may disagree, but I am also over on the trixbox >> forums, and have often seen talk about the 2.6.9 kernel having interrupt >> issues, and such that cause asterisk issues. One reason I think they moved >> forward into the CentOS 5.x stuff, so they got the 2.6.18 kernel, which I >> am >> told works much better, and doesn't have the issues the old kernel did. > > I've also found that I can't get ztdummy working on anything less than > 2.6.23.11. Previous versions seem to have a broken RTC.
It works fine... # uname -a Linux dsx 2.6.18DSX1-CN #8 PREEMPT Fri May 18 16:13:30 BST 2007 i686 GNU/Linux # lsmod Module Size Used by zttranscode 6408 0 ztdummy 2632 0 zaptel 182788 4 zttranscode,ztdummy # zttest -v Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples in 8184 sample intervals 99.902344% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples in 8184 sample intervals 99.902344% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples in 8184 sample intervals 99.902344% 8192 samples in 8192 sample intervals 100.000000% 8192 samples in 8184 sample intervals 99.902344% --- Results after 9 passes --- Best: 100.000000 -- Worst: 99.902344 -- Average: 99.956597 This is running on a 1GHz VIA C3 processor - no RTC, custom compiled kernel and zaptel compiled from source... Gordon _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
