also sprach Tim Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.03.28.1637 +0100]: > I may be missing something here... but won't a 32bit binary run > just fine on a 64bit platform? Would you even see a performance > increase or advantage to a 64bit soft phone versus a 32bit > version?
Not if all the libraries have been compiled for 64bit. Sure, I can run an entire 32bit system on 64bit hardware thanks to "backward compatibility", but I actually run a 64bit machine with native 64bit code. And no, this is not for performance reasons and there wouldn't be any benefits. I just can't run 32bit software. -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ never trust an operating system for which you do not have the source. -- source unknown spamtraps: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
