asterisk-gui or not i always tell my client from a security stand point ie is not a safe browser and recommend they migrate to firefox. most do so willingly due to growing security concerns
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Alan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tony Mountifield wrote: > <snip /> > > Does anyone know what it would take to make the GUI compatible with IE > > as well as FF? > > > That's a big question. > > There are *so many* inconsistencies with IE. See > http://www.positioniseverything.net/ for a good accumulated list of many > of the bugs and hacks to try and fix it. > > Good designers can usually avoid most of the pitfalls but there comes a > time when you just have to code around it... > > Not having used AsteriskNow I don't know the real issues but I'm sure > there is a good reason for not trying to accommodate IE. Firefox is > free, your customer would probably only need it on one or two machines > at the most, and, if they are going with Asterisk, then there shouldn't > be any ethical resistance against using OSS - as long as they know * is > OSS I guess... > > Cheers > > Al > -- > The way out is open! > http://www.theopensourcerer.com > > > _______________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
