Steve Totaro wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:37:42AM +0100, James Williamson wrote: >> > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >> > > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 06:11:02AM +0100, James Williamson wrote: >> > >> Snap, >> > >> >> > >> Well, after trying to buying a TDM400P and then getting persuaded to >> buy >> > >> a TDM410P >> > >> because they no longer sell the 400 model I'd say I'm not impressed. It >> > >> took three 2.6 >> > >> kernel builds (zaptel 1.4 won't even build with the latest kernel >> > >> release) >> > > >> > > What version have you tried? Of Zaptel and of the kernel? AFAIK 1.4.9.2 >> > > builds with latest kernel (or maybe there's actually a small warning >> with >> > > our drivers, fixed in SVN) >> > > >> > > Please provide an error log. >> > >> > Yes, zaptel 1.4.9.2 does compile against a 2.6.24.4 source tree, >> > although the >> > latest release on the website (something like a week ago) was 1.4.8 >> > which doesn't: >> > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel-1.4.8]# make >> > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8' >> > make -C /lib/modules/2.6.24/build SUBDIRS=/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8 >> > HOTPLUG_FIRMWARE=yes modules >> > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.24' >> > >> > WARNING: Symbol version dump /usr/src/linux-2.6.24/Module.symvers >> > is missing; modules will have no dependencies and modversions. >> > >> > scripts/Makefile.build:46: *** CFLAGS was changed in >> > "/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8/Makefile". Fix it to use EXTRA_CFLAGS. Stop. >> > make[2]: *** [_module_/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8] Error 2 >> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.24' >> > make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2 >> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/zaptel-1.4.8' >> > make: *** [all] Error 2 >> >> Yeah, fixed long ago in 1.4.9 (even though there's a very simple >> workaround for it) >> >> >> -- >> Tzafrir Cohen >> icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir >> > > Another vote for 1.2.X. Openvox is the same as Digium TDM400P, it is > the reference design and the cards are made very well. I suggest > trying a Sangoma card. >
I've installed the 1.2.x zaptel drivers, this still doesn't work. Is there anyone in the UK who's successfully got a TDM410P to support caller id or am I just wasting my time? James _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users