> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:07:01AM -0700, Steve Edwards wrote: >> AGIs do not have a substantial "performance hit" and I think people need >> to get this misconception out of their heads. >> >> Writing AGIs in a scripting, non-compiled language may be great for >> prototyping and proving concepts where performance is not expected to be >> an issue. Personally, I don't write AGIs in anything but C. It's the >> sharpest tool in my kit and I know it best.
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > The dialplan isn't compiled either. I guess I didn't make that point forcefully enough. > Now, if it is simple enough to be implemented with the dialplan, then > you don't need to execute half the logic in a separate environment and > don't need the performance hit. I'd like to put this "performance hit" thing to rest. I respect your knowledge and expertise -- I always seem to learn something new (to me) from your posts. How would you "quantify" the "hit?" On my recently retired dev box (1.6GHz Celeron), I could execute 100 AGIs per second but that doesn't really answer the question. > Anyway, what about dialplan logic in lua? Anybody actually uses that > thing? Oh great -- another scripting language to learn :) Thanks in advance, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000 _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
