> Way more handy and will be much more reliable too. Steve Underwood did a > great job implemeting it, but as far as I know the code isn't actively > maintained anymore. Of course your implementation of MFC/R2 will take a while > to become stable, but hey -- it's a start.
Agreed. > Russel pointed some licensing stuff related to the Digivoice drivers. Please > listen to him on that, I had no idea of that kind of complication. If your > implementation of MFC/R2 can't be integrated in Zaptel, then it's no much > better than Unicall. You mean chan_zap/zapata (zaptel is the kernel code). I had already discussed with Russell the licensing. He just got confused for a second because he forgot LGPL code requires both license files (GPL and LGPL). > I guess if you look at Digivoice's code to figure out how it works and then > write your own code, there will be no licensing issues. But that's just a > guess, > Russel will need to clarify it. I did not discussed that with Russell, but I will. In the meantime, since I am aware of the licensing concerns I have not even looked at that code :-) I would like to test the BR variant the next week, I will contact you off-list to see if we can meet via IM. - Moisés Silva -- "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." Voltaire _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
