My question is does ANYONE do ANY testing on these releases? It would
seem that this bug is so paramount to the purpose of the code that had
anyone taken a MINUTE to TEST, it would have been discovered
IMMEDIATELY.
sigh.....
Thanks,
Steve Totaro
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Steve Totaro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sean Bright to Asterisk
>
> show details 4:47 PM (15 hours ago)
>
> There is a bug in 'make install' in Zaptel 1.4.10 that causes the
> devices to not be installed correctly. You can either install 1.4.9 or
> wait for 1.4.11 to be released.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Zoran Milenkovic, Datatek d.o.o.
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi list!
> >
> >
> >
> > I have RHEL Server rel5 (Tikanga) 2.6.18-8.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jan 26 14:15:21
> > EST 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> > with installed digium packets
> >
> > 1. Asterisk 1.4.19
> > 2. Zaptel 1.4.10
> > 3. Libpri 1.4.3
> >
> >
> >
> > My Digium hardware is
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# zaptel_hardware
> > pci:0000:04:00.0 wctdm+ e159:0001 Wildcard TDM400P REV I
> >
> > ...and I have 2 FXO and 2 FXS ports installed inside the TDM400P card
> >
> >
> >
> > The problem is the asterisk doesn't recognize the Zap channels at all. The
> > error is "No channel type registered for 'Zap'
> > " and "Unable to create channel of type 'Zap' (cause 66 - Channel not
> > implemented)" and there is the original output form Astersik console:
> >
> > -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Dial("SIP/zoran-09f1bf90",
> "Zap/3|20") in new
> > stack
> > [Apr 30 13:17:48] WARNING[2845]: channel.c:3001 ast_request: No channel
> type
> > registered for 'Zap'
> > [Apr 30 13:17:48] WARNING[2845]: app_dial.c:1183 dial_exec_full: Unable to
> > create channel of type 'Zap' (cause 66 - Channel not implemented)
> > == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1)
> > -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2] Hangup("SIP/zoran-09f1bf90", "") in
> new stack
> > == Spawn extension (local, 12, 2) exited non-zero on 'SIP/zoran-09f1bf90'
> >
> >
> > And everything was working quite fine when I was on asterisk 1.2.13,
> > previously installed on this very same server, same Digium card etc.
> >
> > The configurations are totaly the same, also.
> >
> > What could be the resolution of this problem?
> >
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
