On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 13:23 +0100, Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote: > Yes. Hrm. For those of us that are following along the AST-* train, patching as per the AST-* release notices, as a matter of process, wouldn't it have been good to republish AST-2008-006 and include this fix along with the original patch?
IOW, IMHO, it should be standard practice that when you release a fix to a patch in an AST-* security release, that you re-publish the security notice complete with the original security fix and the security fix fix. Some of us don't have the bandwidth to keep upgrading to release-of-the-week or to watch every commit looking for both the security fixes and the fixes to the security fixes. Your consideration of this process enhancement would be greatly appreciated. Thanx, b. /me goes off to patch his * once again.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
