On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:13:02PM -0400, Matt Watson wrote: > That's fine... honestly I hate the message myself, however corporate > policy is corporate policy so there isn't much of a point in > discussing it. > > That being said, the message does clearly say that the message is for > the named recipients, in this particular case, the named recipient > is a public mailing list. By my action of sending a message to a > public mailing list, one can say there is implied consent that it gets > distributed to whomever the mailing list chooses on my behalf.
Some mailing list owners are sufficiently disinclined to be the target of the general counsel of a company which doesn't view it that way that they unsubscribe addresses which send such messages as a matter of policy. Just sayin' Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274 Those who cast the vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything. -- (Joseph Stalin) _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
