I might be wrong, but isn't is just saying that the packet has been delayed x-ms? I'm not sure it's saying that Packet 52 arrived 5ms after packet 51. Although even if it was, that doesn't mean that it was sent 5ms after packet 51 either.
-----Original Message----- From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk SIP Packet Time (20ms) > > Packet 50 - Delay 50ms > > Packet 51 - Delay 5ms > > Packet 52 - Delay 5ms > > Packet 53 - Delay 50ms > > Packet 54 - Delay 5ms > > Packet 55 - Delay 5ms > The 20 ms is not the inter-packet timing, its the relative content of > what's within the packet. In other words, the packet contains 20ms of > encoded voice. If that is the case, then what is in packet 52 and 55? There's not enough time between packets for 20ms of voice, unless it's repeating audio in the packets... Regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
