Ex Vito,

Ex Vito wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Ex Vito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  In Our Heads
>>  ------------------
>>  - we're suspecting that the presence of the TC400B is making asterisk behave
>>    in different ways that lead to what we're now calling a hang (that is the
>>     apparent change in the system since it started mis-behaving)
>>  - as such we're considering removing the TC400B to see if the system
>>    stabilizes however removing it may remove the possibility of further
>>    diagnosing this issue and trying fixes
>>  - of course, we're trying to manage customer expectations and
>>    satisfaction at the same time
>>
> 
>   ...other possibility:
> 
>   - instead of removing the TC400B, change the IAX trunk codec to
>     GSM instead of G.729... this would prevent the TC400B usage and
>     may lead to different (as in stable) behaviour
> 
>   More troubleshooting ideas ?
> --
>  exvito
> 


You are right, changing the codec to something other than G729 or G723 will 
prevent the TC400B from being used and would allow you to isolate the issue.

However, I'm working on a new codec_zap / transcoder / wctc4xxp interface to 
primarily handle a condition where some remote system sends a G729B comfort 
noise packet even though we didn't advertise support for it.  

I'm soon going to petition for this interface to be merged into the trunk, so 
if you would like to try the branches out now and need any help, please contact 
me directly.

Thanks,
Shaun


_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to