Hi,

But you can only route SIP signalization over TCP. Audio stream must still go 
thru UDP, right?

BR, Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristian 
Kielhofner
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 4:50 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] SIP over TCP

On 6/22/08, Michael Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so now that it's possible to implement SIP over TCP instead of UDP
>  why would I want to do this? Beyond simply integration with M$ OCS.
>
>  And what are the implications for management of QoS? I would expect
>  that lost packets would be less of a factor.
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  Michael
>  --
>  Michael Graves
>  mgraves<at>mstvp.com
>  http://blog.mgraves.org
>  o713-861-4005
>  c713-201-1262
>  sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  skype mjgraves
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Michael,

  The main advantages for SIP over TCP that I know of (in no particular order):

- Better compatibility with NAT devices (it seems some of them don't
do UDP well)
- Support for TLS
- Support for packet fragmentation (to support large/diverse SDPs, headers, etc)

  I'm sure there are other ones but that's all I can think of this
early on a Sunday morning...


--
Kristian Kielhofner
NOT sent from my iPhone or Blackberry

_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to