On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 12:49 -0400, Noah Miller wrote: > > It is odd that it would work one day and not the next.
Indeed. > I'd have to > say, though that I've seen that rxgain/txgain values beyond +-8 seem > to yield unpredictable results in many areas, Yeah, I was pretty alarmed months ago when I tuned it to 10.9 to get that magical 14844, but there was no echo and CID worked, but given everything was working, didn't really concern myself with it further. > even if they do get you > closer to 14844, and that's even on the cool new cards all the kids > are using these days. And now the obligatory: YMMV Indeed. Things seem to be working again with rxgain at 10.0. Any attempt to push it closer to that 10.5 (from today's calibration) or 10.9 (calibration of a few months ago) yield CID problems again. But I still wonder why the higher values result in "chan_zap.c:6670 ss_thread: Got event 18 (Ring Begin)..." messages and lower values do not AND YET Asterisk answers the Zap/POTS line in either case. I can't help but think that message and the lack of CID at the higher, calibrated value are related. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
