Thank you for you answers. So what tail would be suggested for SIP <-> LOCAL LAN <-> Asterisk <-> ISDN/BRI ?
Is HPEC more or less resource hungry compared to OSLEC? Best regards, Loic Didelot. On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 06:54 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > Gordon Henderson wrote: > > > So at worst, it's saying it can handle 29 incarnations, and at best, 37 - > > that's assuming no other CPU load such as transcoding. > > > > So it's well capable of handing your requirements of 16 channels - more-so > > if you're using a "server" class box, and not the "embedded" type systems > > I'm using here. > > > > (On my dev box, an older 2GHz Celeron, 128KB cache, it's telling me it can > > do 120 incarnations, and on a 2.4GHz Xeon with 4MB cache, it said it could > > do 321) > > Those numbers are with a 16ms tail, which is very short, and unlikely to > be an adequate echo tail for connection to the PSTN (although fine for > analog phones). A more normal configuration would be 32, 64 or 128 > millisecond tails, which would cut those numbers down by a factor of 2, > 4 or 8. > -- Loïc DIDELOT MIXvoip S.a. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mixvoip.com _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
