On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 01:12:42PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:57:49PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:54:21PM -0400, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:35:33PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > > > What's wrong with plain old Zap/NN ?
> > > >
> > > > [test]
> > > > exten => _6XXX.,1,Dial(Zap/{EXTEN:1:3}/${EXTEN:4})
> > > >
> > > > Now call 6<chan_num><number-to-dial> in context test.
> > >
> > > As it happens, Asterisk 1.2 apparently will not recognize 'Zap/01-1' as
> > > the argument to Dial, I get CHANUNAVAIL.
> >
> > Zap/01-1 ??? How come?
> >
> > Zap/01 is valid and equivalent to Zap/1 .
>
> And yet, feeding it to Dial didn't work, and stripping the 0 off did.
>
> I'm on 1.2 if that makes a diff.
I've used this extensively since 1.0, FWIW.
Looking at the code: the paarsing is done by sscanf. Maybe it does not
consider a number with a leading 0 as a number?
What error/warning do you get when trying to use Zap/01 ?
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
