Reply reformatted to comply with international standards. On Sunday 28 December 2003 02:10, Patrick Cantwell wrote: > On Friday, December 26, 2003, Tilghman Lesher wrote: > > On Friday 26 December 2003 13:42, john lawler wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > I just moved from Asterisk release 0.5.0 to CVS 2003-12-22, and > > > after overcoming a few changes in my configuration, I encountered > > > one problem that I couldn't shake that was working fine in 0.5.0. > > > > > > It's the fax detection. I just have a simple extension setup > > > like this: > > > > > > exten => fax,1,Dial(Zap/4,30,tr) > > > exten => fax,2,Hangup > > > > > > in my main incoming context. This used to work fine, I don't > > > think I ever had a false positive or negative, but now just about > > > every call (possibly every call) that comes in when I've got that > > > extension defined rolls to my fax machine on Zap/4 immediately. > > > > Uncomment OLD_DSP_ROUTINES near the top of dsp.c, recompile, > > install, and restart. > > > > The newer DSP routines are used to fix a type of signalling on E&M > > lines. > > What happens if someone needs the new signalling routines *and* > working fax detection? I'm personally not in this boat, but it's > only a matter of time before someone is. > Is this a temporary fix? If not, this should be documented somewhere > as it seems to be a problem for enough people. (Olle? :)
It is a temporary fix until somebody who knows enough about DSP routines can dig in and fix it. There's only one person that I know of that can, and it's not Mark. I'm leaving his name out, so he doesn't get pestered by people asking when. -Tilghman _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
