Hi,
Using FOP, I've met a situation which makes me ask this simple question :
Are both A and B commands bellow equivalent ?
A. CLI:
originate SIP/9122 application dial Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
B. AMI/FOP:
192.168.64.5 -> Action: Originate
192.168.64.5 -> Channel: SIP/9122
192.168.64.5 -> Async: True
192.168.64.5 -> Callerid: 9122 Guest2 <9122>
192.168.64.5 -> Exten: 9123
192.168.64.5 -> Context: local
192.168.64.5 -> Priority: 1
I must add both 9122 and 9123 extensions are SIP extensions which default to
"local" context.
When using B (AMI/FOP), I've got a :
-- Got SIP response 480 "Temporarily Unavailable" back from
192.168.100.195
> Channel SIP/9122-081d8f68 was never answered.
where 192.168.100.195 is SIP/9122 hardphone IP address
When using A (CLI), everything works ok.
Regards
_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
