Tilghman Lesher wrote: > On Wednesday 06 August 2008 04:09:13 Pavel Jezek wrote: > >> A week ago, I tried give realtime priority to asterisk proces using -p >> switch, >> asterisk was running inside astcanary, >> but yestarday asterisk probably starts eating all cpu and lock any >> access to computer, only ping was possible, >> so, anybody have experience, that ascanary process does really work to >> lower process priority in case of overloading? >> > > Not sure, but it should work if the sole issue is that the realtime process is > sitting in a busy loop. Note that if the machine is inaccessible for other > reasons, like a kernel oops, then astcanary can do nothing about that. > > Note that a Linux machine being pingable says nothing about the status > of the kernel. A Linux machine will still reply to pings, even with the > kernel halted -- it's one of the rather strange behaviors peculiar to that > kernel. >
sorry, that I was not clear, kernel was sure fine, because I was even able to call to echo(), but sound was extremelly jerky, that was probably caused by cpu overloading, remote ssh to machine was not possible, months before I was run asterisk under normal priority, and it works fine, I did only two things, realtime asterisk priority using -p switch and load module res_timming_pthread for timing source... PJ _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users